Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Ryan Henry <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:44:47 -0500
Thank you, both Andreas and Louis, for your input!
I would be happy to provide you with some more details, however I'm not sure exactly what details you need.
Let me know what you're after and I'll do my best to provide it.
-ryan
Andreas Meyer wrote:
At least with g++-4.1 on Linux-i686 32bit, I cannot reproduce the problem
(of adding the six points below), so it seems to be specific to the
platform you use ... can you post more details about it?
Note that for delaunay triangulation, exact predicates are sufficient - exact number type/exact constructions are not required.
Best Regards,
Andreas Meyer
Louis Feng wrote:
I compiled your code. I was able to reproduce the problem. I think theproblem is numerical accuracy related. As it has nothing to do with the
number of points you are inserting into the triangulation. In fact if
you
try to add the following points, the same problem occurs:Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 2:28 PM
6.68896e-005 1
6.68852e-005 2
6.68807e-005 0
6.68762e-005 1
6.68717e-005 2
6.68673e-005 0
Maybe you need to use exact number types.
Louis
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
To:
Subject: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Andreas Meyer, 03/30/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Ryan Henry, 03/30/2008
- RE: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Louis Feng, 03/30/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Olivier Devillers, 03/31/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Serge Rehbinder, 03/31/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Olivier Devillers, 03/31/2008
- RE: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Louis Feng, 03/30/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Delaunay_triangulation_2, Ryan Henry, 03/30/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.