Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: periodic tr iangulations --- w as: Re: [cgal-disc uss] Joint CERN/G eometryFactory/CGA LProject Press Release

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: periodic tr iangulations --- w as: Re: [cgal-disc uss] Joint CERN/G eometryFactory/CGA LProject Press Release


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Daniel Duque Campayo <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: periodic tr iangulations --- w as: Re: [cgal-disc uss] Joint CERN/G eometryFactory/CGA LProject Press Release
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:38:57 +0200

Dear Monique,

> I am interested in learning more about the way the problems arise in
> applications. What do you mean by "kernel for toroidal conditions"?

I just vaguely recall these conditions could be implemented at the kernel
level, by redifining distance between two points. I might be wrong, and it
certainly does not matter to me how the conditions are implemented: a valid
triangulation would certainly do the trick.

About how the problem arises in my field (molecular simulation): it is very
simple. One is usually interested in the behaviour of a huge number of
molecules. Since that is impossible, one takes as many as one can handle, but
what does one do with the "borders"? The usual answer is to endow the system
with toroidal boundary conditions, so the borders are not there at all ---
the system is still finite, but at least there are no borders to care about.
These conditions are often called "periodic boundary conditions" in my field.
There is some info (not much, this is a growing project) in
http://www.sklogwiki.org/SklogWiki/index.php/Boundary_conditions

> http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Monique.Teillaud/other-geometries/

Nice. Thanks very much.

Best,

Daniel

--
Daniel Duque
http://rincon.uam.es/dir?cw=950067138671875



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page