Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Bernd Gaertner <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:33:20 +0100
Jens K. Becker wrote:
So I switched to double with which I
am much more familiar (being a geologist).
This is why me and Gmpq do not work together very well but it seems that I just
exchanged one problem against the other.
I didn't follow the thread, so I'm sorry if this has ben discussed/is not helpful: there are also CGAL::MP_Float and CGAL:Gmpzf which are closer to double in some sense than Gmpq.
Best,
Bernd.
- [cgal-discuss] Error with natural_neighbor_coordinates_2, David Reis, 11/28/2008
- [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Jens K. Becker, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Sylvain Pion, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Laurent Rineau, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Sylvain Pion, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Jens K. Becker, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Sylvain Pion, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Laurent Rineau, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Jens K. Becker, 11/28/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Bernd Gaertner, 11/29/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Sylvain Pion, 11/28/2008
- [cgal-discuss] CGAL and valgrind, Jens K. Becker, 11/28/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.