Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Pierre Alliez <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:22:38 +0100
- Organization: INRIA
hi Jona,
did you compile in release and optimized mode?
a écrit :
I've solved the problem about Exact_predicates_exact_constructions_kernel. But
when I use it, the time of difference of two balls is about 900 seconds (using
the SNC_indexed_items).
The minor time that I have obtained is about 250 seconds, using
Simple_cartesian<Gmpq>, with SNC_indexed_items.
The code and the two balls, are the sames that I posted in the before pots.
How can I reduce the time? is possible?
Thanks,
Jona
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, jona_100, 12/18/2008
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, dekosser, 12/18/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 12/18/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, Pierre Alliez, 12/18/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, jona_100, 12/19/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, Pierre Alliez, 12/19/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, jona_100, 12/19/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, Laurent Rineau (GeometryFactory), 12/19/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, jona_100, 12/22/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, jona_100, 12/24/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, Pierre Alliez, 12/24/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] Nef Polyhedron no simple to OFF, jona_100, 12/24/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.