Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
[cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so
Chronological Thread
- From: Andre Massing <>
- To:
- Subject: [cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:49:30 +0200
Hi,
just encounter this misleading description in the docs:
http://www.cgal.org/Manual/beta/doc_html/cgal_manual/AABB_tree_ref/Class_AABB_tree.html
says, that
AABB_tree<AT> tree ( AT at = AT()); Constructs an empty tree.
but in fact it seems not to be possible. Would be nice to have a default constructor to delay the build of the tree until it is really needed.
Greetings,
Andre
- [cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so, Andre Massing, 09/14/2009
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so, Pierre Alliez, 09/15/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.