Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Pierre Alliez <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] [AABB_tree] no default constructor despite documentation says so
  • Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:08:04 +0200
  • Organization: INRIA

thanks Andre for point it this - we'll add it.

notice the function tree.rebuild()

Pierre Alliez
INRIA Sophia Antipolis - Mediterranee Project-team GEOMETRICA http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Pierre.Alliez/
Tel: +33 4 92 38 76 77
Fax: +33 4 97 15 53 95



Andre Massing a écrit :
Hi,

just encounter this misleading description in the docs:
http://www.cgal.org/Manual/beta/doc_html/cgal_manual/AABB_tree_ref/Class_AABB_tree.html

says, that

AABB_tree<AT> tree ( AT at = AT()); Constructs an empty tree.

but in fact it seems not to be possible. Would be nice to have a default constructor to delay the build of the tree until it is really needed.

Greetings,
Andre



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page