CGAL users discussion list

[Marco Aurelio Sterpa <>]

Hi Ben,

I thought that when I read your answer eheh, anyway I reduce a little bit the overall running time but just modifying some function, from a general-purpose library kind to a more specific and less reusable ones. This is not a good thing, but I need to get improvement in a few days cause I have to finish my bachelor thesis. I thank you for your time, best regards,

Marco

2009/11/5 Ben Supnik <>

LOL -- I still have hope!!!

Sorry, what I meant to write was: "I don't think any of the kernels have SLOWER than constanttime operation".

Sylvain: in the case of some of the lazy kernels is it possible that time performance of the whole algorithm could be improved by the reduction of entire sets of geometric or numeric operations that can be eliminated when the DAG is evaluated?

Of course...if this was possible, the algorithm running on top of the kernel would be rather poorly written.

Still, I am excited for the wonderful future of sub-constant time operations. :-)

cheers
ben

Sylvain Pion wrote:

Ben Supnik a écrit :

I don't think any of the kernels have faster than constant-time operations but I am not sure about this.

Well, believe me, I really tried hard, but so far I failed ;-)

--

Scenery Home Page: http://scenery.x-plane.com/
Scenery blog: http://xplanescenery.blogspot.com/
Plugin SDK: http://www.xsquawkbox.net/xpsdk/
X-Plane Wiki: http://wiki.x-plane.com/
Scenery mailing list:
Developer mailing list:

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss