Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Panagiotis Foteinos <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:28:30 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HWLhQSBwDo/KOiWive5QEDak7FDlIemSF575Hdu4oyr00V2zk+rDtx5sYEZNbSrrvk nAQ+qRq1O/AKMouUiHikPAOLOUes9LwtF2H1C/oF+vFKbwE9A9WePqrpsHghYwjdc/vE /JjDkVCp2ncSmddQHDJIxg/Rp1iHDXCJ9D37Q=
CGAL triangulation datastructure (TDS) can represent any triangulation.
How do you know that the adjacency information for the infinite cells is
not correct? Generally, there is not a unique way to triangulate
domains; therefore, it is hard to determine the connectivity correctness
by just visiting the cells.
Regards
Daniel Weber wrote:
> I know that every domain can be triangulated, but i'm not sure if all of
> those triangulations can be represented by the CGAL-datastructures (using
> the infinite vertex).
>
> In my specific case, i use the incremental builder to generate the
> triangulation datastructure out of a tet soup without adjacency
> information. In one case, the incremental builder crashes as it is not able
> to reconstruct the adjacency information for the infinite cells. But the
> source of this (specific) data is the 3D-Mesh Generation package, where I
> only use cells from inside the complex as input. That may be a bug in the
> incremental builder, but first of all i wanted to be sure that this
> representation can handle all cases.
>
> Thank you for your answers.
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>
>> Datum: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:26:26 -0500
>> Von: Panagiotis Foteinos
>> <>
>> An:
>>
>> Betreff: Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations
>>
>
>
>> Are you referring to a specific family of triangulations (for example
>> Delaunay)? If not, then every domain can be triangulated.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Weber
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I know that the infinite vertex in triangulations is used to generalize
>>> insertions of vertices without taking care about the location of the new
>>> vertex (inside / outside the domain). Are there any cases, where this
>>>
>> kind
>>
>>> of modelling fails, meaning that a triangulation of a domain cannot be
>>> represented?
>>>
>>> I could imagine that some triangulations of concave domains cannot be
>>> represented. Does anybody know papers discussing those issues?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>> --
>>> GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
>>> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
>>> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
>>> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
>> To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
>> https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
- [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Daniel Weber, 01/16/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Panagiotis Foteinos, 01/16/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Daniel Weber, 01/18/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Panagiotis Foteinos, 01/18/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Daniel Weber, 01/19/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Nico Kruithof, 01/19/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Daniel Weber, 01/19/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Panagiotis Foteinos, 01/18/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Daniel Weber, 01/18/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Daniel Weber, 01/21/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Nico Kruithof, 01/24/2010
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Infinite vertex in Triangulations, Panagiotis Foteinos, 01/16/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.