Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem]
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:57:27 +0100
wrote:
Thanks for the answer.I am not an export of Polyhedron, I was not aware this function exists. I had a look at the code for the is_closed, and it is checking that no halfedge is on the boundary.
But if I have to do this check manually, what's the purpose of the
Polyhedron::is_closed() function? I thought this function is capable of
doing this.
And if I'm going to check this manually, why should I use the incremental
builder? one then can create triangles from points, which is a lot simpler
to implement (like my first example I wrote in this e-mail), and then do
this check manually (while the check Polyhedron::is_closed() fails to give
the right answer).
Could you please explain what is_closed() function does?
and why I'm
supposed to use the incremental builder for my task if I'm to do this
check manually?
Is there a shorter way to create my polyhedra than I'm taking?
Thank you,
Best regards,
Samer Afach
wrote:
Thank you so much for your answer.First note that Polyhedron can only be used to represent one or more
but I still have 1 unclear issue. I've seen that that example creates a
triangle, meaning a surface. What if I want to create a closed
polyhedron
(like a cube or a tetrahedron)? as a general question I would like to
ask,
is CGAL able to form a "closed" polyhedron and know that it's closed in
an
automatic manner? because as I drew in my first problem, I created the
surfaces, but the program wasn't able to detect that it's a closed
polyhedron (while it's of course closed, since I followed the same
simple
point-structure of the example).
How can I tell CGAL to confirm (not check) that my polyhedron is closed,
so that if I use the check function Polyhedron::is_closed() I would get
the right answer?
Is the incremental builder the right tool for that task?
Thank you again,
Best Regards,
Samer Afach
surfaces.
In the example joint, I manually create a tetrahedron to show that the
incremental builder add faces in a clever way (halfedge are reused when
you add a facet). The number of halfedges is 12.
To know if your surface is closed, you can rely on the theorem of
classification of surface and the Euler characteristic
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic).
The Euler characteristic is 2 for each closed surface encoded by the
polyhedron (the for each is really important here).
S.
Hello,
From what I understand you probably need to use the
Polyhedron_incremental_builder_3.
Have a look here for the documentation (there is an example at the end
of the page)
http://www.cgal.org/Manual/last/doc_html/cgal_manual/Polyhedron_ref/Class_Polyhedron_incremental_builder_3.html
S.
wrote:
Dear programmers,--
I've drawn this question but no one has given me an answer. I would
really
appreciate it so much if someone could even give me a hint to solve
this
problem. It's really very important for me.
Thank you in advance,
Sincerely,
Samer
---------------------------- Original Message
----------------------------
Subject: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem
From: "Samer Afach"
<>
Date: Fri, March 12, 2010 5:15 pm
To:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello :),
I'm starting to create some simple polyhedra in order to go to bigger
applications, and so I'm trying to understand how this library works
with it.
I have a problem, the problem is that I'm failing to create 4
triangles
and form a tetrahedron from them. I'm avoiding using the function
Polyhedron::make_tetrahedron(...) because my aim in the future is
creating random polyhedra by combining triangles and check whether
they
are closed and fulfill some conditions. Here's my program:
#include <CGAL/Homogeneous.h>
#include <CGAL/Polyhedron_traits_with_normals_3.h>
#include <CGAL/Polyhedron_3.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
struct Normal_vector
{
template <class Facet>
typename Facet::Plane_3 operator()( Facet& f) {
typename Facet::Halfedge_handle h = f.halfedge();
// Facet::Plane_3 is the normal vector type. We assume the
// CGAL Kernel here and use its global functions.
return CGAL::cross_product(
h->next()->vertex()->point() - h->vertex()->point(),
h->next()->next()->vertex()->point() -
h->next()->vertex()->point());
}
};
typedef CGAL::Homogeneous<int> Kernel;
typedef Kernel::Point_3 Point_3;
typedef Kernel::Vector_3 Vector_3;
typedef CGAL::Polyhedron_traits_with_normals_3<Kernel> Traits;
typedef CGAL::Polyhedron_3<Traits> Polyhedron;
typedef Polyhedron::Halfedge_handle Halfedge_handle;
int main() {
Point_3 p( 1, 0, 0);
Point_3 q( 0, 1, 0);
Point_3 r( 0, 0, 1);
Point_3 s( 0, 0, 0);
Polyhedron P;
//P.make_tetrahedron( p, q, r, s);
P.make_triangle(p,q,r);
P.make_triangle(p,r,s);
P.make_triangle(p,s,q);
P.make_triangle(q,s,r);
if(P.is_closed())
{
cout<<"It's closed"<<endl;
}
if(P.is_pure_trivalent())
{
cout<<"Trivalent"<<endl;
}
std::transform( P.facets_begin(), P.facets_end(),
P.planes_begin(),
Normal_vector());
CGAL::set_pretty_mode( std::cout);
std::copy( P.planes_begin(), P.planes_end(),
std::ostream_iterator<Vector_3>( std::cout, "\n"));
return 0;
}
I copied this program from a sample in the manual. What's confusing me
is that when I create a tetrahedron using the make_tetrahedron
function,
the conditions work fine, but I can't get the same output when
creating
a tetrahedron by "connecting" 3 dimensional triangles. I was even
careful having the same output as the example (same order for the
norms)
Could anyone please tell me why that's happening, and I would
appreciate
it so much if someone also could apply the function
Polyhedron::is_tetrahedron(Polyhedron::Halfedge_handle) also, because
I
failed to do it because I didn't know how to get the right call for
Halfedge_handle.
Sincerest regards,
Samer Afach
Institute of computational physics, University of Stuttgart
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
- [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/13/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/15/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], samer, 03/17/2010
- Re: [Fwd: [cgal-discuss] Tetrahedron-Polyhedron problem], Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory), 03/15/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.