CGAL users discussion list

["Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>]

stzpz wrote:
> Thanks very much for your reply!
Please found attached patch files that should solve your problem.
Can you try them and tell us whether it works now?


> For the first question, is that better to let the returning 
> supporting_curve() contains the correct auxiliary data? Because the 
> returning type of supporting_curve() is Arr_curve_data_traits_2.
The return type of
Arr_curve_data_traits_2<Traits_org_2,CurveNumber>::X_monotone_curve_2::supporting_curve() 
is Traits_org_2::Curve_2 because it inherits from 
Traits_org_2::X_monotone_curve_2

> In addition, I have one more question. Because I want to calculate the 
> new control points of each sub bezier curve (X_monotone_curve_2), I use 
> parameter_range() with de_Casteljau_2() to do that. But it seems that 
> the returned values of parameter_range() is not so accurate for some 
> case and hence influences the result of de_Casteljau_2(). For example, 
> in the following code,
As documented  parameter_range() returns "the approximate parameter 
range defining the subcurve b."


S.
[snip]

Attachment: patch.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar