Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: "Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory)" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] constrained triangulation existance
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:22:24 +0200
- Organization: GeometryFactory
Le lundi 03 juin 2013 20:48:30 Winnie a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> if I understand it right, the CGAL implementation claims to find a
> constrained triangulation in polynomial time [1]. Given that the
> constraints don't intersect, does this also claim that there always
> exists a triangulation?
>
> If I understand Lloyd [2] [3] right, he claims that the decision whether
> a constrained triangulation exists (he calls it TRI) is already NP-complete.
Re-read more carefully the paper. The decision problem of the paper is the
following:
"A set, V, of points in the plane is triangulated by a subset T, of the
straight-line segments whose endpoints are in V, if T is a maximal subset
such
that the line segments in T intersect only at their endpoints. [...]
Secondly,
we show that the problem of determining the existence of a triangulation, in
a
given subset of the line segments whose endpoints are in V, is NP-Complete."
The edges of a constrained Delaunay triangulation are in a superset of the
constraint segments, and not in a subset.
--
Laurent Rineau, PhD
R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory http://www.geometryfactory.com/
Release Manager of the CGAL Project http://www.cgal.org/
- [cgal-discuss] constrained triangulation existance, Winnie, 06/03/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] constrained triangulation existance, Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory), 06/04/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] constrained triangulation existance, Winnie, 06/06/2013
- Re: [cgal-discuss] constrained triangulation existance, Laurent Rineau (CGAL/GeometryFactory), 06/04/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.