Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] lower_hull_2() problem

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] lower_hull_2() problem


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Philipp Moeller <>
  • To: Alessandro Attanasi <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] lower_hull_2() problem
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:31:40 +0100
  • Organization: GeometryFactory

Alessandro Attanasi
<>
writes:

> Sorry, really stupid error :P. It works as expected!
>
> Just last question about this problem: if I want to use C pointers instead
> of stl iterators, why this code is wrong? It gives to me zero points on the
> lower hull (I tried to use the same logic of the example for convex hull
> computation)
>
> K::Point_2 *ptr2;
>
> K::Point_2 *result2 = NULL;
>
> result2 = (K::Point_2*)malloc(totPoints * sizeof(K::Point_2));
>
> ptr2 = CGAL::lower_hull_points_2( points, points+totPoints, result2 );

Why would you ever call malloc instead of new in such a situation? It is
exactly where your problem comes from. You cannot simply use raw
uninitialized memory as an OutputIterator. You should wrap the pointer
into a raw_storage_iterator provided by the standard header memory. [1]

You also need to take special care when releasing the memory (call the
destructor explicitly).

>
>
> ch_points = (ptr2 - result2);
>
> std::cout << "6) Points on the lower hull = " << ch_points << std::endl;
>
> for(int i =0;i<ch_points;i++)
>
> {
>
> std::cout << result2[i] << std::endl;
>
> }

Footnotes:
[1] http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/raw_storage_iterator



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page