CGAL users discussion list

["Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)" <>]

On 02/11/2014 06:01 PM, jccosta wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Thank you for the patch and I'm sorry for the late reply.
> I tested your code and it seems to work ok (the boundary edges are preserved
> and there aren't weird vertexes placements) but the final quality of the
> decimation is not good.
It is not good because no constrained edge gets removed. So if your
have feature that are densely sampled you will have a lot of triangles
incident to them at the end.

Try the counting one for example.

Sebastien.

> Maybe because of the new stop predicate you wrote. I tried to use your code
> with a different stop predicate (based on a pre-defined number of final
> edges) but it didn't work.
>
> Best,
>
> Jonathas.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-Mesh-Decimation-tp4658610p4658807.html
> Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.