Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Matti Lehtonen <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:18:38 +0300
Hi,
On 27 March 2014 03:19, Zohar <> wrote:
Anyway, about the last linkage error, it seems a different type. But maybe
if you provide a minimal code that reproduces it, I might play with it a
bit.
Fixed. Apparently, an old piece of code became suddenly invalid by newer version of linker. The function where the edge collapse were called, has a parameter, which type were an abstract base class for simplification termination decision classes. => Now worth of an error at link phase. Fixed by using the class as a template parameter.
Matti L
--
Life is complex. It has real and imaginary parts.
- [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Matti Lehtonen, 03/21/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Zohar, 03/23/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Matti Lehtonen, 03/26/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Zohar, 03/27/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Matti Lehtonen, 03/28/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Matti Lehtonen, 03/31/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Zohar, 03/31/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Zohar, 03/27/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Matti Lehtonen, 03/26/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Problems with Triangulated Surface Mesh Simplification, Zohar, 03/23/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.