Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: markus <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
You are right. It is really hard to convert a parametric form to an implicit
form. Perhaps for some equations it isn't possible at all.
Let me come back to what you have written in your first post:
> 1. Your domain is a simple rectangle: [-pi/2, pi/2] x [0, 2 pi]. Trivially
> triangulate it with a regular
> grid (divide the rectangle into a regular grid using two orthogonal sets
> of evenly spaced parallel lines,
> and triangulate the grid).
> 2. Map each triangle to the surface, using your parametric function. While
> there's a surface triangle
> with area above some threshold, subdivide it (subdivide in the domain, and
> map to the surface).
This is a good idea. I only wonder why exactly your idea or something
similar isn't already implemented in CGAL? I could not be the only one who
try to triangulate a surface that is described by an parametric form.
--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/Mesh-Generation-for-Parametric-Surface-tp4659822p4659844.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface, Zohar, 09/11/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface, markus, 09/15/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface, Zohar, 09/15/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface, markus, 09/16/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface, Zohar, 09/15/2014
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Mesh Generation for Parametric Surface, markus, 09/15/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.