Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cgal-discuss - Re: [cgal-discuss] The problem of surface distance computation

Subject: CGAL users discussion list

List archive

Re: [cgal-discuss] The problem of surface distance computation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: GaryGu <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] The problem of surface distance computation
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None ; spf=SoftFail ; spf=None
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:8JpqdRDmiXl26ZL+EZ/yUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP75rsbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakV06yN6+u5BSQp2tWoiDg6aptCVhsI2409vjcLJ4q7M3D9N+PgdCcgHc5PBxdP9nC/NlVJSo6lPwWB6kO74TNaIBjjLw09fr2zQd+KyZ/vnLnus7ToICxwzAKnZr1zKBjk5S7wjeIxxbVYF6Aq1xHSqWFJcekFjUlhJFaUggqurpzopM0roGxsvKcq+MdEFKn7ZK8lVqdwDTI8Mmlz6te4mwPESF6g72ENfXhexhVBGRmbsEmgBs74miT/v+t5niKdOJulHvgPRT2+4vIzG1fTgyAdOmth/Q==
Hi,

I can't build the benchmark program without the cmakelist file.
I did test the similar data size to the benchmark, and the processing time
of the surface distance computation is short about 0.000092 s (depend on the
distance).

But I use the that huge data, it would stuck in the computation for a long
time.
The memory usage is taken almost 100%.

So I think the main cause is the processing data size is too huge to handle
the computation by a normal PC.

Gary



--
View this message in context:
http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/The-problem-of-surface-distance-computation-tp4662048p4662050.html
Sent from the cgal-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page