coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Hugo Herbelin <herbelin AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- To: rap AT dcs.ed.ac.uk (Randy Pollack)
- Cc: coq AT pauillac.inria.fr, coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:17:02 +0200 (MET DST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi Randy,
> This function "shift" doesn't compute as I expected, because
> "le_lt_dec" is Opaque in the library. Of course, this is just one
> lemma; I simply proved it again for myself, making it Transparent.
As far as le_lt_dec is concerned (and other lemmas from Peano_dec
and Compare_dec), it is transparent in the current cvs version of Coq.
As far as I know, the question whether a lemma is Opaque or not
results of a compromise between the need for efficiency (transparency
may induces very strong time penalty on type checking) and convenience
for reduction.
For which (other) theorems do you expect transparency?
Hugo
- [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Randy Pollack
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Hugo Herbelin
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Freek Wiedijk
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Randy Pollack
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Cuihtlauac ALVARADO
- Re: [Coq-Club] Opaque in the library, Hugo Herbelin
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.