coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Benjamin Werner <Benjamin.Werner AT inria.fr>
- To: Marko Maliković <marko AT ffri.hr>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] assumption after split
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:53:00 +0200
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
It is because the tactic after the semicolon is applied to all the
subgoal generated by the tactic before the semicolon.
Here there is no assumption B corresponding to the second
subgoal generated by split.
Benjamin
Le 7 mai 07 à 13:47, Marko Maliković a écrit :
Greetings for everybody,
I'm new in Coq. Please, can somebody explain to me this error:
Coq < Section Proba.
Coq < Variable A B:Prop.
A is assumed
B is assumed
Coq < Hypothesis H:A.
H is assumed
Coq < Goal A /\ B.
1 subgoal
A : Prop
B : Prop
H : A
============================
A /\ B
Unnamed_thm < split;assumption.
Toplevel input, characters 6-16
split;assumption.User error: No such assumption
^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you very much,
Marko Maliković
Faculty of Arts and Sciences in Rijeka, Croatia
--------------------------------------------------------
Bug reports: http://coq.inria.fr/bin/coq-bugs
Archives: http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club
http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/wilma/coq-club
Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/coq-club
- [Coq-Club] assumption after split, Marko Malikoviæ
- Re: [Coq-Club] assumption after split, Benjamin Werner
- Re: [Coq-Club] assumption after split, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] assumption after split, Pierre Casteran
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.