coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Marko Malikovi� <marko AT ffri.hr>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:37:55 +0200 (CEST)
- Importance: Normal
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Greetings,
I need to work with small subset of natural numbers, from 1 to 5.
Normally, I can define it in this way:
Inductive in_subset : nat -> Prop := in_subset_def : forall x : nat,
1<=x<=5 -> in_subset x.
But, for my needs is more appropriate to have definition like this:
Inductive in_subset : nat -> Prop :=
| C1 : in_subset 1
| C2 : in_subset 2
| C3 : in_subset 3
| C4 : in_subset 4
| C5 : in_subset 5.
Is something theoretically (from view of Cic) wrong with this kind of
definitions?
Thank you very much and greetings,
Marko Malikoviæ
- [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers, Marko Malikoviæ
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers,
Pierre Casteran
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers, Marko Malikoviæ
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers,
Marko Malikoviæ
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers, roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers,
Marko Malikoviæ
- Re: [Coq-Club] Subset of natural numbers,
Pierre Casteran
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.