coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Ethan Aubin" <ethan.aubin AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] symmetric equality
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:26:06 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=gnwCLdy8CqlmwkYD1YXlbAO6tVzi/hbYw2boBqYNXrIXfuzuNlSbFr8GaaMF8CFk/r5P6rnOoKaeZusMfOdSgGbFezjFD/EVEoed94z2WyUxnnRZryOHcMouTKeXoRftYwgNUsbNVQ4y82t9WkX6S8D0uWaGhtx5Z6FMD2OrOPk=
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi, This might be an obvious question, but is 'forall (A:Set)(x y:A), (x=y)=(y=x)' provable in Coq? - EA
- [Coq-Club] symmetric equality, Ethan Aubin
- Re: [Coq-Club] symmetric equality,
Stefan O'Rear
- Re: [Coq-Club] symmetric equality, vsiles
- Re: [Coq-Club] symmetric equality,
Sean Wilson
- Re: [Coq-Club] symmetric equality, Stefan O'Rear
- Re: [Coq-Club] symmetric equality,
Stefan O'Rear
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.