coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Edsko de Vries <devriese AT cs.tcd.ie>
- To: Arnaud Spiwack <Arnaud.Spiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] eauto and avoiding non-instantiated existential variables
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:55:30 +0000
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
> I'm not qualified to answer to this part. But I don't think there is
> anything general in that direction. There is a command Instantiate
> (which is undocumented due to a rather poor syntax) which is intented to
> solve this kind of problems (finishing a proof which has uninstantiated
> metavariables). Unfortunately, I can't seem to remember its syntax. If
> someone does, it might possibly be useful as a temporary fix for your
> proofs.
Instantiate (1 := ..) (in ..)
to replace the first existential variable.
Edsko
- [Coq-Club] eauto and avoiding non-instantiated existential variables, Robin Green
- Re: [Coq-Club] eauto and avoiding non-instantiated existential variables, Brian Aydemir
- Re: [Coq-Club] eauto and avoiding non-instantiated existential variables, Vasileios Koutavas
- Re: [Coq-Club] eauto and avoiding non-instantiated existential variables,
Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] eauto and avoiding non-instantiated existential variables, Edsko de Vries
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.