coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: popescu2 AT uiuc.edu
- To: roconnor AT theorem.ca, coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 18:02:23 -0500 (CDT)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hello,
Maybe it is just my ignorance about Coq speaking now, but
working with boolean predicates P : Less n -> bool does not seem to help
either, since then the functions f would be in
f : {i : Less n | P i = true} -> nat and after matching P n' with true I do
not seem to have access to a proof of
P i = true in order to apply f to n'.
(In this and the previous message, I have identified elements of Less n with
elements of nat, in the "Program" style, to keep the ideas clear.)
Regards,
Andrei
- [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums, Andrei Popescu
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums,
roconnor
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums, Carlos . SIMPSON
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums, popescu2
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums,
Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums, Matthieu Sozeau
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums,
Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums, popescu2
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to define (very) dependent numeric sums,
roconnor
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.