coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Andrew McCreight" <continuation AT gmail.com>
- To: frederic.blanqui AT loria.fr
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:04:07 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=xOVZq9vut9Tkn/n9ykGE04qjGHiyI6cV5VjT/YnYNptTlSLGAXJnqwR3ge/Z77sJsvtTjmxUyeKb7PnG5xIgBxmlArgrQNidKepG3M0UI7VEv82tvx53lI9sxHAvv5rWfaDlRn4dCOwzzq+ukvWPcbNHWzr/+hCIXG1SrhD6i1A=
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
This might not be quite what you are looking for, but you can manually define a variant of your tactic with "in" using Tactic Notation.
For a number of examples, look here:
http://logical.futurs.inria.fr/cocorico/Folding%20tactics
-Andrew
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:37 PM, <frederic.blanqui AT loria.fr> wrote:
hello. it is possible to apply some built-in tactics in some hypothesis using the "in" keyword. but it does not seem possible to do the same for user-defined (with ltac) tactics. is there a way to do that i do not know? otherwise, would it be difficult to add this in coq? thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Bug reports: http://logical.futurs.inria.fr/coq-bugs
Archives: http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club
http://pauillac.inria.fr/bin/wilma/coq-club
Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/coq-club
- [Coq-Club] Coq Feature Requests, Michael Day
- [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, Andrew McCreight
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
Yves Bertot
- [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
frederic . blanqui
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.