coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: frederic.blanqui AT loria.fr
- To: Andrew McCreight <continuation AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:08:43 +0200 (CEST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Andrew McCreight wrote:
This might not be quite what you are looking for, but you can manually
define a variant of your tactic with "in" using Tactic Notation.
For a number of examples, look here:
http://logical.futurs.inria.fr/cocorico/Folding%20tactics
thank you very much for this tip. unfortunately, it does not work:
Ltac mytac := ...
Tactic Notation "mytac" "in" ident(H) := ...
after this tactic definition, it seems that "mytac" must always be followed by "in". otherwise we get a syntax error.
in built-in tactics, the "in" is optional...
- [Coq-Club] Coq Feature Requests, Michael Day
- [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
Yves Bertot
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
Andrew McCreight
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis, frederic . blanqui
- Re: [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
Yves Bertot
- [Coq-Club] user-defined tactic in some hypothesis,
frederic . blanqui
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.