coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Conor McBride <conor AT strictlypositive.org>
- To: Coq Club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:25:05 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi Adam
On 9 Jun 2008, at 15:12, Adam Chlipala wrote:
Edsko de Vries wrote:
I'm stuck again in trying to write some dependent code. I want to index a
vector:
I'm sure someone else will answer your literal question, but I want to offer some advice that would lead to different (easier to discharge) goals. I've found that vectors are _much_ easier to work with if you define them by recursion rather than with inductive types.
Let's be clear: this is a fact about Coq, not
about vectors.
All the best
Conor
- [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching, Conor McBride
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching, Conor McBride
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching,
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching, Conor McBride
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching, rcp
- Re: [Coq-Club] More dependent pattern matching,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.