coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Christian Urban <curban AT cs.princeton.edu>
- To: flaviomoura AT unb.br
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr, curban AT cs.princeton.edu
- Subject: [Coq-Club] substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:32:07 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi Flavio,
I am interested on a formalization of the substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation (in Coq). I saw some discussion in coq-club about substitution lemma, but I didn't find nothing in de Bruijn notation anywhere. Does anyone know a formalization of the substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation?
At LFMTP'06, Stefan Berghofer and I wrote about
the substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation in
the context of the lambda-calculus and Nominal
Isabelle.
http://www4.in.tum.de/~urbanc/Publications/lfmtp-06.ps
There we included all reasoning steps involved to
formalise this lemma. They should be easily portable to
Coq. In fact the material was transmitted to us via
Nipkow and Rasmussen from a formalisation by Huet in
Coq. See references in the paper.
Maybe this is of help,
Christian
- [Coq-Club] substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation, Flavio L. C. de Moura
- Re: [Coq-Club] substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation,
Bruno Barras
- Re: [Coq-Club] substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation, Flavio L. C. de Moura
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Coq-Club] substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation, Christian Urban
- Re: [Coq-Club] substitution lemma in de Bruijn notation,
Bruno Barras
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.