coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Brian Aydemir <baydemir AT cis.upenn.edu>
- To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Definitions inside type class definitions (Coq 8.2beta)
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:46:54 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Hi,
I have another question about type classes in Coq 8.2beta. (-:
When defining a record type, I can use "field_name := foo" in order to
explicitly define a field. Since the type class mechanism is built upon
records (or so it seems), can I do the same when defining a type class?
Simply curious,
Brian
- [Coq-Club] Definitions inside type class definitions (Coq 8.2beta), Brian Aydemir
- Re: [Coq-Club] Definitions inside type class definitions (Coq 8.2beta), Matthieu Sozeau
- [Coq-Club] Coq & Java applet, Thery Laurent
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.