coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types
chronological Thread
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT hcoop.net>
- To: Roman Beslik <beroal AT ukr.net>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:44:19 -0500
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Roman Beslik wrote:
Though I use
refine (f_equal (fun a => a b0) _).
instead of
generalize b0.
Are they the same?
You can find out for yourself by using both in proof scripts and running [Show Proof] (while still in interactive proof mode) or [Print <name-of-theorem>] (after finishing the proof with [Qed]).
- [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types, Roman Beslik
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types,
Roman Beslik
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types,
Roman Beslik
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent tuple, pattern-matching, extensional equality of functions, equal types,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.