coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond AT inria.fr>
- To: Flávio Leonardo Cavalcanti de Moura <flaviomoura AT unb.br>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] matching
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:24:13 +0100
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Flávio Leonardo Cavalcanti de Moura a écrit :
l : 0 < b
============================
(fix ith_remainder (d : pair_t) (i0 : nat) {struct i0} : nat :=
match d with
end) (pair a b) (S i + 1) < ith_remainder (pair a b) (S i)
I need to evaluate the function ith_remainder with the arguments (pair a
b) and (S i + 1). If I manage to do so, I will get
mod b (ith_remainder (pair a b) (S i)) < ith_remainder (pair a b) (S i)
and I can close the proof with mod_lt. Any help is very much welcome.
Note that the evaluation can only happen if i0 starts with a constructor. You may try "replace (S i + 1) with (S (S i))" and see if it helps. You haven't provided the script so I can only guess, but I suppose you also have an "unfold ith_remainder" somewhere before; you may have to remove it.
Best regards,
Guillaume
- [Coq-Club] matching, Flávio Leonardo Cavalcanti de Moura
- Re: [Coq-Club] matching,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] matching, Flávio Leonardo Cavalcanti de Moura
- Re: [Coq-Club] matching, Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] matching, Flávio Leonardo Cavalcanti de Moura
- Re: [Coq-Club] matching,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.