coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives

From: Keiko Nakata <keiko AT kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: [Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:46:38 +0900 (JST)

Hello,

I have not yet experimented it enough,
but does [dependent destruction] interact with guardedness of coinductives
in a way that [dependent inversion] does not?

I might guess that the trick with JMeq touches guardedness.

Best,
Keiko

[Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives, Matthieu Sozeau