coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Matthieu Sozeau <mattam AT mattam.org>
- To: Keiko Nakata <keiko AT kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:27:27 -0500
Le 25 janv. 10 à 08:46, Keiko Nakata a écrit :
Hello,
I have not yet experimented it enough,
but does [dependent destruction] interact with guardedness of coinductives
in a way that [dependent inversion] does not?
I might guess that the trick with JMeq touches guardedness.
Hi Keiko,
it might as it rewrites more than dependent inversion I guess,
and rewriting does not always play well with guardedness.
-- Matthieu
- [Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] dependent destruction for coinductives, Matthieu Sozeau
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.