coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adam AT chlipala.net>
- To: Gyesik Lee <gslee AT ropas.snu.ac.kr>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:55:36 -0500
Gyesik Lee wrote:
Sorry, a bit late in the discussion.
There are two main options. First, you can use a cast:I really like this "case" trick. But I am really wondering if we can
Hypothesis t_full :
forall n:nat, exists s:States, match t_nat in _ = T return T with
refl_equal => s t end = n.
avoid using [JMeq] in principle or at least in many (how many?)
cases?
I can answer "yes" if you're OK with this statement of the property: [JMeq] with its associated axiom is logically/expressively equivalent to normal equality with the [eq_rect_eq] axiom from Coq's [Eqdep] library. Chapter 9 of CPDT (http://adam.chlipala.net/cpdt/) shows how to encode each predicate and its introduction/elimination rules in terms of the other predicate and its rules.
- [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis, Hai WAN
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis,
Gyesik Lee
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis,
Gyesik Lee
- Re: [Coq-Club] how to state a hypothesis with the help of another hypothesis,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.