coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Kenneth Roe <kendroe AT hotmail.com>
- To: Coq-Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] A proof I'm having difficulty with
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:29:07 -0700
- Importance: Normal
I have abstracted out the appropriate definitions from my model. I'm trying to figure out a good approach for this proof. I'm pretty sure that it requires classical logic. The key to the proof is to show that "v < vars" in the theorem at the end. To do this, I'd like to assume that v >= vars and then construct an m and m' that are counter examples to the first hypothesis. How can I set this up? I've included all the relevant definitions. Hopefully, some Coq guru can solve this quickly.
- Ken Definition Map := (prod (list nat) (list heap)). Fixpoint var_in_pos (n : nat) (l : list nat) : nat := match n with | 0 => match l with | nil => 0 | (f::r) => f end | S x => match l with | nil => 0 | (f::r) => var_in_pos x r end end. Fixpoint heap_in_pos (n : nat) (l : list heap) : heap := match n with | 0 => match l with | nil => empty_heap | (f::r) => f end | S x => match l with | nil => empty_heap | (f::r) => heap_in_pos x r end end. Definition hv (n : nat) (x : Map) := heap_in_pos n (snd x). Definition heap_count (x : Map) := length (snd x). Definition ev (n : nat) (x : Map) := var_in_pos n (fst x). Definition var_count (x : Map) := length (fst x). Definition changedMap (vars : nat) (heaps : nat) (m : Map) (m' : Map) : Prop := (forall n, n < vars -> ev n m = ev n m') /\ (forall n, n < heaps -> hv n m = hv n m'). Theorem stateIndependentMapChanged: forall i v mm mm' vars heaps, (forall (s : state) (m m' : Map), (forall v : nat, snd s v = None) /\ (forall v : id, v <> i -> fst s v = None) /\ fst s i = Some (ev v m) -> changedMap vars heaps m m' -> (forall v : nat, snd s v = None) /\ (forall v : id, v <> i -> fst s v = None) /\ fst s i = Some (ev v m')) -> changedMap vars heaps mm mm') -> ev v m = ev v m'. |
- [Coq-Club] A proof I'm having difficulty with, Kenneth Roe
- Re: [Coq-Club] A proof I'm having difficulty with,
Adam Chlipala
- RE: [Coq-Club] A proof I'm having difficulty with, Kenneth Roe
- Re: [Coq-Club] A proof I'm having difficulty with,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.