coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: ���� <hskiowa AT kaist.ac.kr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:49:15 +0900 (KST)
Dear coq-club:
I am cautious about assuming the following:
Axiom fun_eq : forall (A B : Type) (f g: A -> B) (a : A), (forall a : A, f a = g a) -> f = g.
<or>
Parameter realize : forall {A:Type}, (A->Prop)->A.
Axiom realization : forall {A:Type} (P:A->Prop), (exists! x:A, P x) -> P (realize P).
(* Note that "unique existence (exists!)" is assumed instead of "mere existence (exist).")
What are expected dangers of assuming each?
Sincerely,
Hyung Sun Kim
- [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms, ±èÇü¼±
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms,
Pierre-Marie Pedrot
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms,
Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms,
Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms, AUGER Cedric
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] I am cautious about adding some axioms,
Pierre-Marie Pedrot
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.