coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: Victor Porton <porton AT narod.ru>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:41:57 -0400
Victor Porton wrote:
I am now studying Coq. I want to create a theory of posets, semilattices,
lattices, and complete lattices.
I consider to base my theory on the above mentioned ZF modules.
I suggest thinking hard before trying to do Coq developments that look like ZF. Type theory is an _alternative_ to set theory, and it is much more convenient for the sorts of theorems I have experience with. You might find the same for your domain. You can easily work with sets (e.g., ensembles in the Coq standard library) without bringing in ZF.
- [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Adam Chlipala
- [Coq-Club] Re: Where is the set theory?,
Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Where is the set theory?, Carlos.SIMPSON
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Andrej Bauer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Daniel Schepler
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Andrej Bauer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Victor Porton
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Andrej Bauer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?,
Daniel Schepler
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.