coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT cnam.fr>
- To: Coq Dev <coqletsgo AT yahoo.com>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:34:59 +0100
This is due to the presence of "Local Unset Elimination Schemes" in
MSetPositive.v. which means that elimination schemes are not generated
automatically when tree is defined. Someone will probably tell us the
reason for this. In the same file later there is an explicit:
Scheme tree_ind := Induction for tree Sort Prop.
Which builds one for sort Prop. You can build the same for sort Set in
you own file:
Scheme tree_rec := Induction for PositiveSet.tree Sort Set.
Then your induction will work.
P.
PS Your name "Coq Dev" is confusing, as it is the name of a mailing
list. Please consider changing it.
2011/12/21 Coq Dev
<coqletsgo AT yahoo.com>:
> Lemma l: forall (p p' : PositiveSet.t), {p = p'} + {p <> p'}.
> Proof.
> induction p.
- [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets, Coq Dev
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets, Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets, AUGER Cédric
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets,
Damien Pous
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets,
Charles D
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets, AUGER Cédric
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets, AUGER Cédric
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets,
Charles D
- Re: [Coq-Club] Decidable equality on PositiveSets,
Damien Pous
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.