coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Luke Maurer <maurerl AT cs.uoregon.edu>
- To: Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
- Cc: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:05:53 -0800
On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:18 AM, Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr> wrote:
Well, anything from finding out what theorems auto ends up using to figuring out how something like the remember tactic works or debugging my own proof script by checking that it's doing what I think it's doing. Very useful for peeking under the hood when I don't need the fine detail of the debugger.
The debugger is sometimes helpful, but as Adam said, the lack of control over granularity can make it clumsy to use or worse. I wasn't aware of debug eauto though - thanks, that should cover part of my needs. - Luke |
- [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!, Luke Maurer
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!, Luke Maurer
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!, Paul Broome
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!, Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!, Luke Maurer
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!, Jonas B. Jensen
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] No more info tactical?!,
Arnaud Spiwack
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.