coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: Bernard Hurley <bernard AT marcade.biz>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:23:53 -0400
On 04/23/2012 09:20 AM, Bernard Hurley wrote:
I think Saint is trying to obtain a contradiction from the fact that he can prove v = v0 from v = v0 -> False.
There fairly clearly is no contradiction inherent in such a deduction. For instance, let [v = 0] and [v0 = 0]. The goal would be proved by reflexivity.
- [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, wesongathedeveloper
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Alan Schmitt
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Chad E Brown
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, Jonas Oberhauser
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, Saint Wesonga
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, Saint Wesonga
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Chad E Brown
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, Saint Wesonga
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Inversion of a Prop Hypothesis,
Alan Schmitt
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.