coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT cnam.fr>
- To: Paolo Herms <paolo.herms AT cea.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:06:15 +0200
I am sorry but I did not find the reference to the tactic argument of
econstructor at the url you gave and in the documentation in general.
Can you be more precise please?
Best regards,
P.C.
2012/5/22 Paolo Herms
<paolo.herms AT cea.fr>:
> Of course, this is documented as part of the tactic language
> http://coq.inria.fr/refman/Reference-Manual012.html
> --
> Paolo Herms
> PhD Student - CEA Software Safety Lab. / Inria ProVal project-team
> Paris, France
>
>
- [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Francois Pottier, 05/21/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Viktor Vafeiadis, 05/21/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Francois Pottier, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Paolo Herms, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, AUGER Cédric, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Pierre Courtieu, 05/23/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Paolo Herms, 05/23/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Paolo Herms, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Francois Pottier, 05/22/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.