coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Paolo Herms <paolo.herms AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:25:10 +0200
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:35:53 Viktor Vafeiadis wrote:
> econstuctor (solve [eauto]).
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 11:06:46 Pierre Courtieu wrote:
> I am sorry but I did not find the reference to the tactic argument of
> econstructor at the url you gave and in the documentation in general.
> Can you be more precise please?
>
No sorry, I just didn't read Viktor's mail correctly.
Me too, I didn't know about the tactic argument of econstructor which can be
greatly useful and should absolutely be documented.
--
Paolo Herms
PhD Student - CEA Software Safety Lab. / Inria ProVal project-team
Paris, France
- [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Francois Pottier, 05/21/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Viktor Vafeiadis, 05/21/2012
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Francois Pottier, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Paolo Herms, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, AUGER Cédric, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Pierre Courtieu, 05/23/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Paolo Herms, 05/23/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Paolo Herms, 05/22/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] A smarter "induction;econstructor" combo?, Francois Pottier, 05/22/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.