Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Conditioning notations on whether something is in [Prop] or in a larger [Type].

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Conditioning notations on whether something is in [Prop] or in a larger [Type].


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
  • To: Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl>
  • Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Conditioning notations on whether something is in [Prop] or in a larger [Type].
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 04:02:42 -0400

Thanks!  Is this done mostly in ocaml?  (grepping the source tree suggests yes.)  Is it replicable in pure Coq?
Are there plans to generalize this feature a la [Add Parametric Relation] and [Add Parametric Morphism]?

-Jason

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to generalize some of the standard library constructs to permit
> the use of [Type] rather than [Prop] (in particular, the structures that are
> behind the scenes of [reflexivity], [transitivity], [symmetry], [Add
> Parametric Relation], [Add Parametric Morphism], and
> [rewrite]/[setoid_rewrite]).

Some of these issues have been resolved when using [identity] instead of [eq].

Bas




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page