Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Conditioning notations on whether something is in [Prop] or in a larger [Type].

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Conditioning notations on whether something is in [Prop] or in a larger [Type].


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl>
  • To: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Conditioning notations on whether something is in [Prop] or in a larger [Type].
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:09:46 +0200

The patch is here:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/coq-club/2011-05/msg00204.html

Your work should also be useful for homotopy type theory, so please
keep us informed about your progress.

Best,

Bas

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jason Gross
<jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks! Is this done mostly in ocaml? (grepping the source tree suggests
> yes.) Is it replicable in pure Coq?
> Are there plans to generalize this feature a la [Add Parametric Relation]
> and [Add Parametric Morphism]?
>
> -Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Bas Spitters
> <spitters AT cs.ru.nl>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Jason Gross
>> <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm trying to generalize some of the standard library constructs to
>> > permit
>> > the use of [Type] rather than [Prop] (in particular, the structures that
>> > are
>> > behind the scenes of [reflexivity], [transitivity], [symmetry], [Add
>> > Parametric Relation], [Add Parametric Morphism], and
>> > [rewrite]/[setoid_rewrite]).
>>
>> Some of these issues have been resolved when using [identity] instead of
>> [eq].
>>
>> Bas
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page