coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Robbert Krebbers <mailinglists AT robbertkrebbers.nl>
- To: Ben Lerner <blerner AT cs.brown.edu>
- Cc: Coq club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:12:33 +0100
On 03/14/2013 08:47 PM, Ben Lerner wrote:
Or might there be a Hint form that typeclass resolution could take, toWhat do you expect to happen in case of overlapping instances?
tell it that it's ok to leave some goals unproven after normevars?
Instance proper1: forall x, A x -> Proper bla (f x)
Instance proper2: forall x, B x -> Proper bla (f x)
What would you expect to happen here? A goal "A x \/ B x", to non-deterministically get the goal "A x" or "B x"? To get the goal belonging to the first declared instance?
Besides, the premisses of a hint (or instance) can also have arrows in them, making the situation even more peculiar.
Robbert
- [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Ben Lerner, 03/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Robbert Krebbers, 03/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Ben Lerner, 03/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Robbert Krebbers, 03/15/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Ben Lerner, 03/15/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Robbert Krebbers, 03/15/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Ben Lerner, 03/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Robbert Krebbers, 03/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Question on morphisms and "conditional" setoid rewriting, Robbert Krebbers, 03/14/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.