The Coq mailing list

[Altenkirch Thorsten <psztxa AT exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>]

Which bug was this?

I only saw the one which allowed you to prove anti-extensionality? But
this wasn't related to termination, or?

Thorsten

On 06/01/2014 16:54, "Cody Roux" 
<cody.roux AT andrew.cmu.edu>
 wrote:

>Nice summary!
>
>
>On 01/06/2014 08:49 AM, Altenkirch Thorsten wrote:
>> Agda enforces termination via a termination checker which is more
>> flexible but I think less principled than Coq's approach.
>     That's a bit scary given that there was an inconsistency found in
>the Coq termination checker just a couple of weeks ago :)
>
>     BTW, has anyone tried reproducing the bug in Agda?
>
>
>Cody

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, 
please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, 
copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any 
attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do 
not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, 
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the 
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.