Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com>
  • To: Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
  • Cc: Anders Lundstedt <anders AT anderslundstedt.se>, "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation
  • Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 08:44:03 -0800

On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 06:55:39 AM Arnaud Spiwack wrote:
> Indeed. And in fact, there is also the singleton monad, whose Kleisli
> category is the category of functional relations.

Hmm, and what would the Eilenberg-Moore category be? Maybe something like
the
category of types with a unique choice operator -- which I guess isn't that
interesting after all since the only such constructible operators I can think
of is on unit, empty types, or products of types in the image of singleton.
--
Daniel Schepler




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page