coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
- To: Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Anders Lundstedt <anders AT anderslundstedt.se>, "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 20:51:32 +0100
Well, precisely. An algebra A on S, the singleton monad, is given by a ι:S A -> A, such that ι{a} = a (the product condition is vacuous, since S A is isomorphic to S (S A)). Algebra morphism are just regular functions. That's a definition of a definite choice operator. As per types that support such an operator, there are the sub-singleton types too. So it may still be of use.
On 28 January 2014 17:44, Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 06:55:39 AM Arnaud Spiwack wrote:Hmm, and what would the Eilenberg-Moore category be? Maybe something like the
> Indeed. And in fact, there is also the singleton monad, whose Kleisli
> category is the category of functional relations.
category of types with a unique choice operator -- which I guess isn't that
interesting after all since the only such constructible operators I can think
of is on unit, empty types, or products of types in the image of singleton.
--
Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Guillaume Melquiond, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Guillaume Melquiond, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Rui Baptista, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Daniel Schepler, 01/28/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/28/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Daniel Schepler, 01/28/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/28/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Daniel Schepler, 01/28/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/28/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Guillaume Melquiond, 01/27/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Notation for functional relation, Arnaud Spiwack, 01/27/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.