Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Tactic for detecting that there is a goal left?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Tactic for detecting that there is a goal left?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com>
  • To: "coqdev AT inria.fr" <coqdev AT inria.fr>, coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Tactic for detecting that there is a goal left?
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:16:22 +0100

Actually, my [at_most_one_goal_left] tactic doesn't work.  Is there a way to detect "zero or one goals"?


On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jason Gross <jasongross9 AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Is there a standard way of asking the question "are all goals solved?" and "is there at most one goal left?" in Ltac?

I can use "; solve [ idtac ]" to mean "fail if there are any goals left", and I have been using "; []" to detect "exactly one goal left", and and I can define a tactic
  Ltac at_most_one_goal_left := idtac; [].
so that "; at_most_one_goal_left" will fail if there is more than one goal.  But is seems poor that inlining a tactic definition changes its behavior; am I simply exploiting a bug?

-Jason




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page