coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Arnaud Spiwack <aspiwack AT lix.polytechnique.fr>
- To: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] shelve_unifiable question
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:12:10 +0200
This is indeed a bug. Or rather was. For it is now fixed.
On 4 September 2014 15:45, Jonathan <jonikelee AT gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/04/2014 08:50 AM, Arnaud Spiwack wrote:Goal forall a b:nat, exists c:nat, c=a+b.
When using all:shelve_unifiable, is it always supposed to shelve allSaid like that, it sounds like a bug. Can you provide me with a concrete
focused goals that correspond to evars in other focused goals?
It seems like all:shelve_unifiable doesn't shelve a dependent evar goal if
it was modified (as by renaming a hypothesis within it, or case analyzing a
hypothesis within it, or adding a new hypothesis to it, etc.), even though
it still corresponds to an evar in other focused goal(s).
example of this behaviour?
intros a b.
refine (ex_intro _ _ _).
all:rename a into a'. (*works without this line*)
all:shelve_unifiable.
-- Jonathan
- Re: [Coq-Club] shelve_unifiable question, Arnaud Spiwack, 09/04/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] shelve_unifiable question, Jonathan, 09/04/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] shelve_unifiable question, Arnaud Spiwack, 09/04/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] shelve_unifiable question, Jonathan, 09/04/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.