Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Using the [cut] tactic in hypothesis

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Using the [cut] tactic in hypothesis


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonathan Leivent <jonikelee AT gmail.com>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Using the [cut] tactic in hypothesis
  • Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 19:34:46 -0500

On 12/24/2014 06:44 PM, Abhishek Anand wrote:
The lemma you are looking for is Z_zerop. Here's how I found it:

SearchPattern ( {?z=0} + {?z<>0}).

On bad days, I might have to issue more queries like
SearchPattern ( {?z<>0} + {?z = 0}).
SearchPattern ( {?z<>0} + {0 = ?z}).
.... i.e their might be a lemma with a logically equivalent, but
syntactically different form.
My question to Coq gurus : Is there a smarter version of SearchPattern?

Regards,
-- Abhishek
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~aa755/


I tend to use the minimal covering pattern that wouldn't produce too many extra matches to look through - like

SearchPattern (which is ^C-^A-^O in PG) ({_} + {_}).

Then, since I'm using PG, I can incrementally search the result. It's also interesting to see the near misses - as one can get a feel for things like naming conventions.

-- Jonathan




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page