coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jacques-Henri Jourdan <jacques-henri.jourdan AT inria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:09:35 +0100
Le 10/03/2016 17:33, Ralf Jung a écrit :
> So I wonder, would it be possible to add a flag to Coq to disable the
> elim restriction? Would that make sense? It's a little like
> type-in-type, except that it's not actually unsound if not combined with
> classical axioms.
If I remember correctly, this restriction is important to soundness :
because Prop is impredicative, we can build a proof of false from
inhabited T -> T.
-- JH
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Roger Witte, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Ralf Jung, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 03/10/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Optional elim restriction?, Roger Witte, 03/10/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.